The Open Athenaeum

✧ Origins

Nun and Atum: The Mound That Rose from the Water

The Egyptian beginning, told four different ways by four cities that never had to agree

Ancient Egyptian (Heliopolis, Hermopolis, Memphis, Thebes) · Pyramid Texts c. 2350–2180 BCE, as compiled 1904

Before Egypt, the record says, there was Nun, water without edge, bottom, or light, nothing in it. Egypt kept at least four different accounts of what happened next, one per city, and never retired any in favor of the others.

At Heliopolis (Iunu, to the Egyptians), the account begins with Atum, who made himself, arising alone out of Nun to rest on the first dry ground, a mound the texts call the benben, remembered later in the pyramid capstone and the obelisk’s point. The Pyramid Texts, Egypt’s oldest surviving religious writing, say Atum brought forth Shu, god of air, and Tefnut, goddess of moisture, from his own body alone. From Shu and Tefnut come Geb the earth and Nut the sky, held apart much as Rangi and Papa, though here earth is the god below and sky the goddess above. From Geb and Nut come Osiris, Isis, Set, and Nephthys, completing the Ennead, the Nine, the company of gods Heliopolis kept at its center.

Hermopolis kept an older answer: not one self-made god but eight, the Ogdoad, four gods paired with four goddesses, frog-headed and serpent-headed, standing for the raw qualities of the water before the world: water itself (Nu and Naunet), boundlessness (Heh and Hauhet), darkness (Kek and Kauket), and hiddenness (Amun and Amaunet). Together, the eight brought forth the egg, or in some tellings the lotus, from which the sun first rose. Memphis kept a third answer: its god Ptah creates by neither self-birth nor collective labor but by thought and speech, as Breasted’s 1912 translation of the Memphite priests puts it, “through the thought of the heart that came forth from the tongue.” Thebes kept a fourth: Amun, one face among Hermopolis’s eight, the hidden one, rose over the New Kingdom into the empire’s supreme god, merged with the sun as Amun-Ra, his priesthood folded by royal order into the country’s most powerful religious office.

The record, honestly

Egypt rarely had to choose. Heliopolis, Hermopolis, Memphis, and Thebes each kept its own priesthood and account of the beginning, all four running at once for centuries, sometimes nested inside one another (Memphis folds Atum into Ptah’s prior thought; Thebes folds the Heliopolitan cast under Amun), but never flattened into one required version. This entry’s main source, E. A. Wallis Budge’s The Gods of the Egyptians (1904), remains a public-domain doorway into all four accounts, still consulted for its range. But Budge worked before the twentieth century’s major advances in Egyptian grammar and dating, and Egyptologists today read many of his claims, and his taste for tidy universal schemes, with caution. Where this entry quotes the Pyramid Texts, it follows excerpts in Budge and in Breasted’s 1912 lectures, both public domain and superseded since by later translation, Faulkner’s chiefly, that this library cannot rehost.

The library’s hand

What the library keeps from Egypt is not a creation story but a habit of mind. Every other door in this wing eventually settles, however many variants nest inside it, on one telling. Egypt built plurality into its state religion on purpose: a mound, an assembly of eight, a thought, a hidden name, each sufficient for its own temple, none required to answer to the rest. It is not so far from what this library is itself attempting.

a young page · the keeper's voice pass is still to come

Free, and kept that way by readers. If this page served you, keep a lamp lit.

Doors Onward

Sources & Further Reading

  1. Budge, E. A. Wallis (1904). The Gods of the Egyptians, or Studies in Egyptian Mythology. 2 vols. London: Methuen. (Public domain.)
  2. Pyramid Texts (Old Kingdom, c. 2350–2180 BCE), as excerpted and translated in Budge (1904) and in Breasted, J. H. (1912), Development of Religion and Thought in Ancient Egypt, Lecture I. (Public domain.)
  3. Egyptology has substantially revised many of Budge's specific readings since 1904; see the honest note below.